Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1528 (BOM)

RAJESHWAR NARAYAN BASATWAR. v. DR. PRAVIN SHRIDHAR VAKTE AND OTHERS.

CA/6745/2026 · 2026-07-02

Shri Abhay J Mantri

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 911.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6745 OF 2026 IN FA/1690/2026 RAJESHWAR NARAYAN BASATWAR VERSUS DR. PRAVIN SHRIDHAR VAKTE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Pawankumar S. Agrawal Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Deshmukh Shriram Vinod … CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 02nd JULY, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Learned Advocate Mr. Agrawal, submitted that on the complaint of Mr. Rajesh Narayan Basatwar, the enquiry was initiated. However, he was not made a party in the Appeal. Therefore, he has tendered a Civil Application and urged that he be added as a party Respondent in the First Appeal. 2. Learned Sr. Advocate Mr. Deshmukkh, for the Appellants, has given no objection. 3. The Civil Application tendered across the bar is taken on record. The office is directed to register the same. 4. In view of the no objection given by the learned Sr. Advocate Mr. Deshmukkh, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. 2026:BHC-AUG:25468 2 911.odt 5. The Appellants are directed to implead Mr. Rajesh Narayan Basatwar, as Respondent no. 2 in the First Appeal no. 1690/2026. Accordingly, the Appellants are directed to carry out the amendment forthwith and supply the amended copy to the Appeal memo to the Court and the Respondents. Learned Advocate Mr. Agrawal, acknowledged the copy of the Appeal memo. 6. The Application is disposed of. ( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) SPC