1 APHC010032782026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 329/2026 Between: 1. K. KRISHNA PRASAD, S/O. K. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.9/779, NIZAMPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD I A S, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT IRRIGATION AND CAD WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DR MAHESH KUMAR RAVIRALA I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING) DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 4. SRI CH GOPINATH, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, DOWLESWARAM, GODAVARI EASTERN DIVISION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 5. SRI M V VKISHORE, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DRAINAGE DIVISION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 6. SRI PRAKHAR JAIN, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, APSDMA ANDHRA PRADESH STATE DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY , KUNCHANAPALLI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 329/2026 O R D E R: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.24936 of 2025 on 06.10.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order: “… The Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amount to the petitioner in accordance with the quality control certificate dated 24.03.2025 for a sum of Rs.10,50,229/- issued by the respondents, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No order as to costs” As far as interest component is concerned, if there is any subsisting clause in the agreement/work order envisaging payment of interest upon any amount which is due and payable, the same is binding upon both the parties. There shall be no order as to costs”. 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, M/s Annamneedi Balakrishna (23769) learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the order dated 06.10.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.24936 of 2025 has been complied-with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _______________________ SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA KS Dated 13.03.2026. 4 125 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 329/2026 DATED 13.03.2026 KS