Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15277 (DEL)

RAKESH & ANR. v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./6045/2026 · 2026-08-18

Girish Kathpalia

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL. M.C. 6045/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.08.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010383202026 + CRL.M.C. 6045/2026, CRL.M.A. 25272/2026 & 25273/2026 RAKESH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Hemdeep Moran, Advocate. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with Inspector B.D. Meena. Mr. B.K. Mishra, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 258/2015 of PS Badarpur for offence under Section 498A/406/506/323/34 IPC on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has settled the disputes with the petitioners and now all of them are living together. 2. Learned APP for State, assisted by IO/Inspector B.D. Meena accepts notice and submits that there is no objection of State to this petition. 3. Respondent no.2, present in Court and identified by the IO, also GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.18 17:54:10 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:18.08.2026 17:55:40 Signature Not Verified CRL. M.C. 6045/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages accepts notice. 4. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that now for past six years she has been residing with the petitioners happily and has settled all her disputes. It is further submitted by respondent no.2 that from her wedlock with petitioner no.1, one son was born, who is currently aged 16 years and is living with them. Since now they are living happily as a family, respondent no.2 submits that she does not want to continue prosecution of the petitioners. 5. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. 6. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 258/2015 of PS Badarpur for offence under Section 498A/406/506/323/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Accompanying applications also stand disposed of. GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) AUGUST 18, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.08.18 17:53:58 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:18.08.2026 17:55:40