Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15276 (BOM)

PANDIT KUNDALIK PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/524/2026 · 2026-10-05

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

43BA524-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 43 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 524 OF 2026 Pandit Kundalik Pawar VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. Usmanpurkar Aniruddha S., Advocate for the Applicant (appointed) Mr. V. K. Kotecha, APP for the Respondent-State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 5th October, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. By the previous order, this Court had called for the report from the learned trial court pertaining to the schedule, in which, the trial will be concluded. 2. The report dated 20.09.2026 has been received from the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Latur. In the report, it is stated that 10 witnesses are already examined and eight wittiness are left. The learned trial court has informed that the present trial can be taken up on every Monday and Tuesday from 30.09.2026 and accordingly, the trial can be concluded on or before 20.11.2026. 3. The scheduled provided by the learned trial court seems to be very reasonable and therefore, I am not inclined to grant the present application. The application stands disposed of. 4. The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that in case 1 of 2 43BA524-26 the trial is not so concluded, he be granted liberty to move fresh application. 5. Liberty to the present applicant prefer fresh application, in case, the trial is not concluded by the end of December, 2026. If any such application is preferred, the learned trial court shall consider and decide the same on its own merit taking into consideration the progress in the trial. 6. Fees of the appointed Advocate is quantified to Rs.7500/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Five Hundred only) to be paid by the Legal Services Sub Committee, High Court, Aurangabad. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 2 of 2