IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution Pet. No. 1373 of 2026 Decided on : 13 th July , 2026. Tara Chand Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Yogita Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raj Pal Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Notice. Mr. Raj Pal Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. In the light of the fact that the direction in the writ petition was only to decide the representation of the petitioner and as of now the Authorities has done the needful. The grievance as raised in the present execution petition has to be raised by an independent writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant execution petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the grounds so raised in this petition. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3. Accordingly, the instant execution petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 13th July, 2026. (jai) …2…