[2026:RJ-JP:3368] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 562/2026 Rajkumar S/o Late Shri Prem Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Near Village Daggi, Singarabagar, Chhattar P.s. Uchchan, District Jind And House No. 184/3, Shitalpuri Colony, Narwana Road, P.s. Jind City District Jind, Haryana. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Poonam Devi (Present in Person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/01/2026 1. Mrs. Poonam Devi w/o accused-petitioner- Rajkumar present before the Court. Advocates are not appearing today in the Court. Mrs. Poonam Devi has submitted photocopy of Aadhar Card which shows that she is the wife of the accused-petitioner. 2. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 530/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Section 109(1) of BNS and Section 3/30 of Arms Act. 3. It is contended by the wife of the accused-petitioner that complainant Shakti Singh has entered into a compromise with the petitioner and submitted copy of an affidavit containing the fact that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. It is also contended that the complainant did not receive any fire arm injury [2026:RJ-JP:3368] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-562/2026] and there was no attempt to cause murder of the complainant. It is also contended that no fire arm was recovered at the instance of accused-petitioner, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the affidavit submitted by the wife of the accused-petitioner so also the rejection order dated 03.01.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan, which shows that no injury was sustained to injured Shakti Singh. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, and parties have amicably settled their dispute, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rajkumar S/o Late Shri Prem Singh, in connection with FIR No. 530/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali (West), District Vaishali Nagar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/119