APHC010028912026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 1846/2026 Between: 1. CHENNUPATI VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, S/O. CH.RAJA GOPALA RAO AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O.D.NO.59- 9-411, GAYATHRINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-8 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,SECREARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237 2. VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER,VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT.520001. 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT APCPDCL, NEAR RAMAVARAPADU RING ROAD,GUNADALA VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.520004 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT APCPDCL, NEAR RAMAVARAPADU RING ROAD,GUNADALA VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.520004. 5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, APCPDCL,OPP. RAMESH HOSPITAL VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT-520008 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in erecting electric polls in petitioners Private land bearing door No. 54-15-1 B which is a commercial building (Now called Suryaprakash square) situated at Gurunanak Colony Road, Gunadala Vijayawada as arbitrary illegal and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and amounts to illegal trespass and also in violation of fundamental rights guarantee Article 14, 21 and Article 300 A of Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. V V SATISH 3. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No: 1846 of 2026 ORDER: Sri V. V. Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission of this Court to withdrawn the Writ Petition, with a liberty to work out other remedies available. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out other remedies available in accordance with law. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J 30.01.2026 ARB 4 28 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 1846 OF 2026 Date:30.01.2026 ARB