Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15261 (ALL)

DILIP KUMAR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15158/2026 · 2026-10-05

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15158 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Mr. K. Shahi, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling the record of the case and quashing the impugned result dated 28.07.2026 of the selection on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher subject Hindi declared by the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Commission, Pryagraj, only to the extent of incorrect option given by the Commission of the Question No. 95 of the Petitioner's Question Booklet bearing Serial No. 602307413, for the post of the Trained Graduate Teacher subject Hindi. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to award 4 marks to the Petitioner or delete the Question No. 95 of the Petitioner's Question Booklet bearing Serial No. 602307413, since the option of that Question are incorrect. iii. Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. iv. Award cost of the writ petition to the petitioner." 3. The issue in question has already been settled by the Lucknow Bench of this Court by its judgment dated 28.09.2026 passed in Writ-A No.8055 of 2026 (Seema Gupta And 20 Others vs. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others). Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankur Rai, Vikalp Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi Dilip Kumar Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Considering the fact that a decision has already been taken by the respondent authorities with respect to Question No.95 of the petitioner's question booklet of the Hindi question paper of the T.G.T. Examination (Adv. No.01/2022). The respondent authorities may take a decision and proceed with the declaration of result accordingly. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of, accordingly. October 6, 2026 K.N. WRIA No. 15158 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad