MOHAMMAD SUBHAN YATO v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1289/2026 · 2026-06-15
Shahzad Azeem
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1526 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1526 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.42 Supplementary Cause List-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1289/2026 CM(3446/2026) Mohammad Subhan Yato. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. S. A. Qadri, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others. ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shahzad Azeem, Judge.
ORDER 15.06.2026 The subject matter of this petition is already pending disposal before the Executive Magistrate/Tehsildar, Chadoora, in terms of Section 270 of BNSS, however, without delineating any plausible reason to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, the instant petition is preferred. Nonetheless, keeping in view the nature of controversy involved, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Executive Magistrate/Tehsildar, Chadoora to expedite the proceedings pending in file titled “Mohammad Shaban Yatoo & Anr. Vs Manzoor Ahmad Yatoo & Ors” under Section 270 of BNSS and decide the same within a period of three months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of along with connected CM in the manner indicated above.
(Shahzad Azeem)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 15.06.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 16.06.2026