Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15259 (AP)

Tumu Narendra Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/468/2026 · 2026-02-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

’1 - fm. % '4' iwSil' IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATNl^ MONDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX iPRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 2^ K I 'i \ lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO: 468 OF 2026 Between: Tumu Narendra Kumar, S/o Gopala Rao R/o H.No. 17-3-33/2, Gannabathula Street, Police Bomma Centre, Bhimavaram West Godavari ...Petitioner/4‘^ Accused (Petitioner in CRLP 468 OF 2026 on the file of High Court) AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, (CID PS, Mangalagiri), Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A. P. 2. B Rajasekharam, S/o Ram Mohan Bharadwaj, Regional Manager, R-V, Regional Business Office 3-19-8/9, 1®'floor, Bhupal Plaza, Bhupal Nagar Beside Bhashyam School, Tadepalligudem West Godavari. ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant (Respondents in-do-) Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extent the time for complying the direction passed by this Hon’ble Court in CRL.P.No.468 of 2026 dated 06.02.2026 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of CRLP No.468 of 2026, on the file of the High Court. T The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and the order of the High Court dated 06.02.2026 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Pamarthy Rathnakar, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1, the Court made the following; ORDER: Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that this Court by order dated 06.02.2026 in Crl.P.No.457 of 2026 granted bail to the Petitioner with some conditions. Further, Petitioner couid not secure the sureties within the stipulated period and he could not surrender before the Trial Court and prays to extend the time considering the circumstances of the case. Learned Assistant Pubiic Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made and a fair look at the order passed by this Court on 06.02.2026 two weeks time is granted to surrender the petitioner before the concerned trial Court and on such surrender, he will be released on bail on the conditions as stated in the said Order. It is represented that the Petitioner couid not secure the sureties and prays for extension of time. Having regard to the facts of the case and considering the submissions made, further time of two weeks is granted from this day and the petitioner is directed to take necessary steps for compliance of the order dated 06.02.2026. It is made clear that no further time is granted in the mattp^. Accordingly, lA No.1 of 2026 is ordered. SD/- N.NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFfWr //TRUE COPY// For !! / To, 1. The Station House Officer, ClD PS, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. B.Rajasekharam, S/o Ram Mohan Bharadwaj, Regional Manager, R-V, Regional Business Office 3-19-8/9, floor, Bhupal Plaza, Bhupal Nagar Beside Bhashyam School, Tadepalligudem West Godavari. (By RPAD) One CC to Sri. Pamarthy Rathnakar, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP [OUT] One spare copy 2. 3. 4. 5. HIGH COURT Dr.VJP,J DATED:02/03/2026 ORDER IA.No.1 OF 2026 IN CRLP.No.468 of 2026 ORDERED