Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15253 (JHR)

SUMIT KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4564/2026 · 2026-05-29

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15700 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4564 of 2026 ---- Sumit Kumar Das, Aged about 20 years, Son of Vijay Das, Resident of Govindpur Kusaha, P.O.+P.S.- Pathrol, District – Deoghar. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Karn, Adv. For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 29th May, 2026 1. Heard Mr. Nikhil Karn, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP. 2. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.43 of 2026. 3. The petitioner was apprehended by the police as he was suspected to be involved in cyber-crime. One mobile phone with SIM Card was recovered from this petitioner. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no victim has come forward to lodge any complaint against this petitioner and further the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 26.03.2026. 5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Regard being had to the above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, cyber-crime cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.43 of 2026, subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated: 29th May, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 01.06.2026