Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15249 (BOM)

RAJU GIRAJIRAM KHAJINDAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/3939/2026 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15nobAppln3939-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3939 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1270 OF 2026 … Raju Girajiram Khajindar and others Versus State of Maharashtra and others … Mr. Vijay Ramrao Lange, Advocate for the applicants Mr. V. K. Kotecha, APP for the State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 28th September, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Not on board. Taken on board. 2. The applicants submit that the present application is for restoration of the original proceedings, which came to be dismissed for non-removal of the office objections pertaining to the signature on the amended copy. The learned Advocate for the applicants submits that he is ready and willing to remove the office objections immediately. None appeared for the respondent-complainant when the conditional order was passed, except the learned APP. 3. Taking into consideration that the non-removal of the objections was not deliberate and that the applicants are willing to remove the objections immediately, I am inclined to allow the application and restore the original proceedings. 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:45904 15nobAppln3939-26 4. The objections be removed within a period of two weeks from today. Upon removal of the objections to the satisfaction of the Registry, the learned Advocate for the applicants is at liberty to circulate the main matter for hearing. 5. The Criminal Application is disposed of in the above terms. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 2 of 2