Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010191362026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2599/2026 NURUL AMIN SO LATE HAZRAT ALI, RO VILL BHALUKI, PS BARPETA ROAD, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781313 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate for the Petitioner : R AMIN, S K RAHMATULLAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 28.09.2026 Heard Mr. R. Alim, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the accused- applicant. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State. 2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for granting bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Barpeta Road P.S. Case No. Page No.# 2/2 88/2026, registered under Sections 21(c)/22(b)/22(c) of the NDPS Act, 1985. 3. The facts as narrated in the FIR dated 28.07.2026 are that, on receipt of information, the investigation team went to the pharmacy belonging to the accused- applicant and on search, after following the due procedure, in terms of the NDPS Act, the investigation team found following items, i.e., 500.28 grams of suspected morphine, 480 tablets of TROS PAS CPL PLUS (suspected to contain Tramadol), 480 Nitrazepam tablets, and other incriminating materials from the pharmacy. 4. On receipt of the FIR, the police registered the Barpeta Road P.S. Case No. 88/2026, under the aforementioned sections. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant submits that the pharmacy does not belonged to him and he just happened to be there during the time of search. Therefore, he submits that the applicant should be granted bail at this stage. 6. Mr. Parasar, learned Addl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail, citing the instant case involves a commercial quantity. 7. Case Diary in the instant case has been received and the same is perused by this Court. 8. Taking into account the materials available in the Case Diary as well as the allegations made in the FIR, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the accused- applicant at this stage. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands rejected. JUDGE Comparing Assistant