Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15247 (RAJ)

AKRAM KHAN S/O AZAM KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/347/2026 · 2026-01-22

Inderjeet Singh, Ravi Chirania

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2861-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 347/2026 1. Akram Khan S/o Azam Khan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Ishnaka, Tehsil Nagar, District Deeg (Rajasthan) 2. Fazru S/o Moti, Aged About 74 Years, R/o Village Ishnaka, Tehsil Nagar, District Deeg (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The District Collector, District Deeg (Raj.) 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nagar, Distt. Deeg (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with Mr. Prateek Saxena Ms. Anjali Ranga Ms. Anshul Ranga Ms. Divya Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 22/01/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of Sunil Jangid and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.988/2026) along with other connected matters decided on 21.01.2026. [2026:RJ-JP:2861-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-347/2026] In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands dismissed in view of the judgment passed by this Court in the matter of Sunil Jangid and Ors. (supra). The petitioners are at liberty to file fresh writ petition in case their names are not included in the voter list. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Upendra Pratap Singh /64