KAPIL MEENA S/O SHRI DHANRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/824/2026 · 2026-01-30
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15245 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15245 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4402] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 824/2026 Kapil Meena S/o Shri Dhanraj, R/o Ward No. 6 Bambuliya Kalan, P/s Itawa, District Kota Rural (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhim Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 30/01/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.274/2024 registered at Police Station Jawaharnagar (Kota City), District Kota City for offences under Sections 103(1), 109(2), 111(4), 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner's name has not been mentioned in the FIR, and even the informant, Nikhil Verdhan, in his statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, has not named the petitioner. He submits that no specific weapon has been recovered from the present petitioner, and on the similar grounds, a Co-
[2026:RJ-JP:4402] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-824/2026] ordinate Bench of this Court has granted bail to the co-accused Govind and Arjun Gurjar vide order dated 05.08.2025 and co- accused Tarun Choudhary, Sunny Damor and Yuvraj Gurjar have been enlarged on the bail by this Court vide order dated 28.11.2025 and 11.11.2025 respectively. Petitioner is behind the bars since 30.08.2025 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Kapil Meena S/o Shri Dhanraj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/2