UDAY YADAV ALIAS UADAY THAKUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2788/2026 · 2026-05-29
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15245 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15245 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:15661 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A. B. A. No. 2788 of 2026
---
1. Uday Yadav @ Uaday Thakur
2. Ajay Yadav
3. Hiraman Ganjhu
4. Kuldip Ganjhu
… … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party
---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioners
: Mr. Ganesh Ram, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party : Spl.P.P.
--- 02/29.05.2026
Heard Mr. Ganesh Ram, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Spl.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026.
It has been alleged that the petitioners were involved in illegal cultivation of poppy plants. Though, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the several co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail, but it appears that all the petitioners have criminal antecedents of similar nature of offence and considering the same, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
This application stands rejected.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) Uploaded Amar – Samarth Uploaded on-__/05/2026