Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010210522026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2355/2026 IMRAN AHMED AND 2 ORS SON OF LATE AZIZ ANSARI R/O- HOUSE NO.12, CHRISTIAN BASTI, GMCH ROAD, MASJID PATH, PS DISPUR DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. 2: HASSIN ANSARI ALIAS HASSAN AHMED SON OF LATE AZIZ ANSARI R/O- HOUSE NO.12 CHRISTIAN BASTI GMCH ROAD MASJID PATH PS DISPUR DIST- KAMRUPM ASSAM 3: NEK MUHAMMAD ALIAS NEK AHMED SON OF LATE AZIZ ANSARI R/O- HOUSE NO.12 CHRISTIAN BASTI GMCH ROAD MASJID PATH PS DISPUR DIST- KAMRUPM ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P., ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A HAWARI, MR. S AGARWAL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 29.09.2026
Heard Mr. A. Hawari, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioners have prayed for pre arrest bail in connection with Dispur PS Case No. 673/2026 registered under Section 296/115(2)/117(2)/74/351(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioners are apprehending arrest was lodged on 12.09.2026 by the victim stating inter alia that on the same day at around 06:00 pm, he found some motor bikes being parked in front of his house and when he requested the people to remove the bikes, the petitioners attacked him in his neck and when his mother and brother went to rescue, the accused persons attacked in his private areas and tore his clothes. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that there was a mutual fight amongst the parties and that the petitioner had also lodged an FIR which, however, he submits was not registered. 4. Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on the other hand submits that allegations against the petitioners are writ large in the FIR. 5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, more so, in view of the fact that there was a mutual fight amongst the parties and no injuries were stated to have been caused to the victim, this Court enlarges the petitioners on pre arrest bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs.
20,000/- each with one local surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction
Page No.# 3/3 of Arresting Authority under the following conditions: i) the petitioners will appear before the Investigating Officer within a period of 15 days from the date of the order. ii) the petitioners will appear before the Investigating Officer thereafter as and when called for. ii) the petitioners will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. iii) the petitioners will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the Arresting Authority. 6. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant