Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13533 WP No. 6412 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 6412 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. JAYANNA S/O.LATE MUNIRANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS VIVEKANANDA ROAD, HOSAHALLI HUNASAMARANAHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU 562157.
2. SMT.SUSHEELAMMA, W/O. GOPALAPPA.C AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS.
R/O. MARNAHALLI VILLAGE & POST JALA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU- 562157.
3.
SMT. RADHA, W/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
4.
KUM. AKKAYAMMA, D/O. LATE MUNIRANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
PETITIONER NO.3 & 4 ARE R/A NO. 27, MILK DAIRY ROAD, HOSAHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU 562157. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHASHANK.C., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VENUGOPALA M S., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13533 WP No. 6412 of 2026
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU 560009.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR, YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU 56 0064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITIONIS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO EFFECTING THE POUTHI KHATHA AND ENTER THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND AT SURVEY NO.21 MEASURING 4 ACRES SITUATED AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, NOW YELHANKA TALUK IN PURSUANCE TO THE GRANT CERTIFICATE, BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14-10-2024 AND 13-11-2025 VIDE ANNEXURE A AND B AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13533 WP No. 6412 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 05.03.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition while also seeking liberty to file a comprehensive writ petition on the same cause of action.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioners as prayed for.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
DL CT: JL