$~143 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010361502026 + W.P.(C) 11240/2026 NARAYANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anupradha Singh, Ms. Saraswati Km Jha, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kritika Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 07.08.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers :- “a. Pass a writ of Certiorari or any order/ direction or any appropriate writ, quashing and setting aside the impugned appellate order dated 08.04.2025 passed by the Appellate Authority of Respondent no. 1 in Appeal No. 62-GP/2024; b. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any order/ direction or any appropriate writ, directing the Respondents to treat the Petitioner as eligible under the Delhi Slum & JJ Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2015 and allot to her an alternative dwelling unit forthwith in accordance with the policy;…” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:44:30 2. For the reasons stated in the application, issue notice. 3. Ms. Gupta, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1/DDA. 4. Ms. Gupta, learned counsel at the outset, states that the petitioner has furnished a wrong address as Jhuggi 22, Golden Park, Ram Pura, Delhi, which has already been demolished and the respondent No. 1 is in complete control and possession of the area in question. 5. However, Ms. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the entitlement of the petitioner was rejected only on the ground that the name of the petitioner did not figure in the voter list for the year 2015 and 2019. 6. She also states that the petitioner’s name was already there and the petitioner has certified copies of the voter list for the year 2015 and 2019, showing the name of the petitioner therein. 7. In this view of the matter, she states that the respondent No. 1 may reconsider the claim of allotment to the petitioner. 8. Ms. Gupta, learned counsel, even though opposes the same, states that the respondent No. 1 will consider the present writ petition as a representation and will pass a speaking order thereupon within 4 weeks from today. Let it be so done. 9. This Order is being passed in the peculiar facts of the present case and shall not be treated as a precedent. 10. With these directions, the petition is disposed of. JASMEET SINGH, J AUGUST 7, 2026/sp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:44:30