Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15233 (AP)

M/S SP PHARMA LINES v. V. ANJANEYULU, IRTS

CC/248/2025 · 2026-02-18

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010030672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 248/2025 Between: 1. M/S SP PHARMA LINES, 5-8-352, FLOOR, RAGHAVA RATNA TOWERS HYDERABAD-500 001 ,ABIDS HYDERABAD(DIST.), TELANGANA REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. KAMAL KISHORE BIYANI S/O SATYANARAYAN BIYANI ...PETITIONER AND 1. V ANJANEYULU IRTS, The Director of Insurance Medical Services, Kesineni Bus Yard, Kakni Venkata Ratnam Road, Enikepadu, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh - 521104. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and deliberately violating the orders in W.P 20830 of 2024 dated 16.10.2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D S SIVADARSHAN Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 248/2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 16.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20830 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents by virtue of proceedings dated 19.11.2025 stated that they paid only principle amount as directed by this Court. He further submits that for the delay which was caused in payment, the petitioner would be entitled for interest. Therefore, to pursue the same, the petitioner would be granted liberty for initiating appropriate proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents furnished written instructions dated 12.02.2026, wherein, it is stated that the orders of this Court are complied with and no further orders are necessary. Accordingly, learned counsel for the respondents requested to close the contempt case. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, in view of the written instructions dated 12.02.2026, the orders dated 16.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.20830 of 2024 are complied with and no further orders are necessary. It is further observed that as requested by the learned counsel for the petitioner, 3 the petitioner is at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings with regard to the interest amount, if any. 6. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to proceed further with regard to the interest amount, if any, to be payable by the respondents to the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 19.02.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP 4 48 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO:248/2025 19.02.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP