Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15232 (RAJ)

NADAN SINGH S/O GIRRAJ v. GIRRAJI W/O RAMKISHORE

CW/688/2026 · 2026-01-19

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2183] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 688/2026 1. Nadan Singh S/o Girraj, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan 2. Vikram S/o Nadan Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan 3. Shivraj S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan 4. Ramswaroop S/o Girraj, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. Girraji W/o Ramkishore, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan 2. Balveer S/o Ramkishore, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Badawajidpur, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli, Rajasthan 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, District Karauli. 4. Tehsildar, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Rahul Sonal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 19/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 26.11.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge No.1, Hindaun City, District Karauli, whereby in the First Regular Appeal the matter has been remanded back to the learned Trial Court. [2026:RJ-JP:2183] (2 of 2) [CW-688/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the respondents raises a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the writ petition. He submits that against the remand order, the remedy available is to file a Miscellaneous Appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners also could not dispute the said position of law. However, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal. 4. Considering the same, the present Civil Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 5. Registry is directed to return back the certified copy of the order to the petitioners after retaining a photocopy on record. 6. The petitioners would be entitled to have benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/EKTA/4