Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010044432026 2026:GAU-AS:3664 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/239/2026 SHRI DILIP PATIR ALIAS KETEP PATIR SON OF SUBANKAR PATIR, R/O VILL- KEMI, P.S. JONAI DIST. JONAI, ASSAM PIN-787060 2: DIBASH PAIT SO LATE SATYA PAIT RO VILL KEMI PS JONAI PIN 787060 ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P R SARMA, MR. S PEGU Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : AB/1722/2025 SHRI DILIP PATIR ALIAS KETEP PATIR AND ANR SON OF SUBANKAR PATIR R/O VILL- KEMI P.S. JONAI DIST. JONAI Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN-787060 2: DIBASH PAIT S/O LATE SATYA PAIT R/O VILL- KEMI P.S. JONAI DIST. JONAI ASSAM PIN-787060. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR WILDLIFE ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR P R SARMA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 13.03.2026 1. Heard Mr. H. Kuli, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. K. K. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. 2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the applicant in connection with Anticipatory Bail Application No.1722/2025 praying for correction of a typographical error which has crept in the order dated 23.07.2025 passed in AB Case No. 1722/2025. Page No.# 3/3 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in Paragraph No.11 of the said order, the PRC Case No. has been wrongly mentioned as PRC Case No. 42/2025 whereas it ought to have been PRC Case No. 43/2025. 4. I have considered the materials available on record. 5. It appears that the said error is a typographical error and the same needs to be rectified. 6. Accordingly, the PRC Case No.42/2025 as mentioned in paragraph No. 11 of the order dated 23.07.2025 in AB Case No. 1722/2025 shall be read as the PRC Case No. 43/2025. 7. This Interlocutory Application is, accordingly, disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant