Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9771 WP No. 7310 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 7310 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S SANVI AUTO AGENCIES HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO. 12, 13, 14, 21, PALANAJO GAHALLI, DODDABALLPUR, BANGALORE 561203, KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR
2.
MS. VIDYA AD PROPRIETOR, AGED 38 YEARS W/O DEEPAK RESIDING AT SHREE NILAYA, 1ST WARD, BEHIND VOKKALIGARA BHAVANA, GANGADHARAPURA, DODDABALLPUR, BANGALORE 561203,
3.
MS.H.M SAVITHRI AGED 65YEARS W/O R GOPAL RESIDING AT SRI NILAYA, GANGADHARAPURA, DODDABALLPUR, BANGALORE – 561203
4.
SRI DEEPAK S G S/O R GOPAL AGED 45 YEARS
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9771 WP No. 7310 of 2025
RESIDING AT: SHREE NILAYA, 1ST WARD, BEHIND, VOKKALIGARA BHAVANA, GANGADHARAPURA, DODDABALLPUR, BANGALORE 561203, …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
HERO FINCORP LTD A NON BANKING FINANCIAL CORPORATION DULY REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO 34, COMMUNITY CENTRE, BASANT LOK, VASANT VIHAR NEW DELHI 110057 REP. BY REGIONAL MANAGER …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR S N., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE AUCTION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK DATED 24/02/2025 IN NO. AN/HFCL/SAA/25/AN-2/1, IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER CONCERNED AND PRODUCED AT (ANNEXURE-D). DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CLOSE THE LOAN AS PER THE OTS SCHEME AVAILABLE AS ON THIS DAY TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRESH MATTER, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9771 WP No. 7310 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging the auction notice dated 24.02.2025 vide Annexure ‘D’ issued by the respondent.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that no auction was held on the date fixed in Annexure ‘D’.
3. In view of the same, nothing survives for
consideration in this writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
RK CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30