2026:HHC:28345-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.2489 of 2013 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 __________________________________________________________ M/s Techno Plastic Industries ....Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Narvada, Advocate vice Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Janak Raj, Central Government Standing Counsel, for respondents No.1 and 2-UOI. Mr. Neeraj Sharma and Mr. Ishaan Kashyap, Advocates, for respondent No.3-Chief Commissioner of Income Tax. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Ms. Narvada, Advocate, under instructions of Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned original counsel, submits that she has instructions to withdraw this petition, being infructuous, in view of subsequent events. 2. Accepting her prayer, present petition is disposed of accordingly, alongwith all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge July 13, 2026 [Bhardwaj] 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?