FA 2582/13 & Ors. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2582 OF 2013 THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS VERSUS MARUTI MAHADA DOKE ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. S.N. Morampalle ... WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2583 OF 2013 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2584 OF 2013 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2585 OF 2013 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2586 OF 2013 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2587 OF 2013 … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : September 30, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard the learned AGP for State/appellants. 2. By these appeal, the appellants/State assails the Judgment and award dated 10.4.2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-I, Beed in LAR Nos. No.176/2005, 174/2005, 175/2005, 173/2005, 191/2005 and 179/2005. 3. The learned AGP submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with 2026:BHC-AUG:46244 FA 2582/13 & Ors. 2 Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/