[2026:RJ-JP:3181] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 305/2021 1. Son Devi W/o Rajesh Kumar D/o Amar Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ganesh Chowk Mandir Ke Pass, Mahuwa Dausa -321608. 2. Rekha Tiwari W/o Shri Govind Sharan Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Dilip Singh Colony Jaipur Road, Mahuwa, Dausa. 3. Anuradha Sharma W/o Brij Bihari Sharma, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 671 Kiro Ki Gali Ka Chauraha Bohraji Ka Mohalla, Mahuwa, Dausa. 4. Kanta Jain W/o Shashi Bhusan Jain, Aged About 48 Years, R/o V/p Rashidpur Mahuwa, Dausa. 5. Renu Paliwal W/o Arvind Paliwal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Janak Colony Mahuwa, Dausa. 6. Laxmi Parmar W/o Ruprendra Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Gazipur, Gazipur, Mahuwa, Dausa. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Director Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 2. Distt. Elementary Education Officer, Dausa. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Rakh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 23/01/2026 1. Application No.1/2021 dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Instant writ petition is filed with following prayer:- a) Respondents be directed to give notional benefits including seniority benefits to the [2026:RJ-JP:3181] (2 of 3) [CW-305/2021] petitioners from the date when similarly situated persons/person lower in merit then the petitioners were given appointment in the year 2008 i.e., 1/10/2008 in pursuance to advertisement for the post of prabodhak. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that he has filed an application No.1/2022 for disposal of writ petition in light of judgment in case of Govind Das Vaishnav and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.: S.B. CWP No.1798/2012 order dated 26.05.2014 passed by a Coordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and further order dated 19.08.2020 in S.B. CWP No.7434/2020 titled as Bharat Lal Meena and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. passed by another Coordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He has also submitted order dated 01.08.2018 in S.B. CWP No.16134/2018 titled as Mamta Devi Jangid and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on the basis of judgment in case of Govind Das Vaishnav Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and also in case of Suman Jhanwar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.: S.B. CWP No.5405/2012 decided on 12.05.2014 at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that writ petition may be disposed at this stage subject to examination of veracity of facts as claimed by the petitioners, so as to apply the ratio. 5. Having considered aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed in light of judgment in case of Suman Jhanwar Vs. State (supra) and further relied upon in case of Govind Das Vaishnav Vs. [2026:RJ-JP:3181] (3 of 3) [CW-305/2021] State (supra), Mamta Devi Jangid Vs. State (supra) and Bharat Lal Meena Vs. State (supra), if applicable upon facts of the case. 6. The petitioners shall submit a copy of this order within 30 days along with representation to the respondents for consideration of their case in light of judgments as referred hereinabove. The respondents shall examine the veracity of the facts and if the facts are same and the ratio is applicable, they shall accord the same benefits as extended by a Coordinate Bench in case of Suman Jhanwar Vs. State (supra), but in case of deviation decide with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /32