[2026:RJ-JP:2759] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.51/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18416/2017 Surendra Singh S/o Shri Saheb Singh, aged about 40 years, Resident of Village and Post Mundia, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Dr. Joga Ram, Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Krishna Kunal, Secretary, School Education Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Shri Neelabh Saxena, District Collector, Collectorate, Karauli, Rajasthan. 4. Shri Shiv Charan Meena, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Karauli. 5. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Anshuman Singh Mr. Saurabh Sharma on behalf of Mr. K.P. Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/01/2026 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging contempt of order dated 05.08.2024 passed by the Co- [2026:RJ-JP:2759] (2 of 2) [CCP-51/2025] ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18416/2017, whereby directions were given to grant same benefits to the petitioner as were granted in the case of Sunita Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1032/2017. 2. At the outset, learned Additional Advocate General submits that in compliance of order passed by this Court, matter of the petitioner was considered and has been decided vide speaking order dated 29.10.2025. 3. Copy of the order has also been placed before this Court, which is taken on record. 4. Copy of the order has also been given to the learned counsel for the petitioner today itself. 5. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition at this stage with liberty to challenge the same before Competent Authority. 6. Permission sought for is granted. 7. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 8. Notices stand discharged. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/49