Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15210 (ALL)

M/S S P SAI IT PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/22241/2026 · 2026-10-07

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22241 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 13.12.2025 bearing Case Crime No. 710 of 2025 registered under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C.) P.S. Surajpur, District- Gautam Budh Nagar (Annexure No.1 to this writ petition); (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the directors and employees of the petitioner pursuant to the F.I.R. dated 13.12.2025 bearing Case Crime No. 710 of 2025 registered under Sections 406, 420, 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C.) P.S. Surajpur, District- Gautam Budh Nagar." 2. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded to the court concerned on 06.03.2026. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 5 submitted and prayed that the instant writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. M/S S P Sai It Private Limited .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A. as well as the fact that the parties concerned have already settled their dispute amicably outside the Court. 4. Heard Mr. Ashutosh Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State-respondents, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Johari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5, and perused the material on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been forwarded and the parties concerned have settled their dispute outside the Court, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication. 6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of. October 8, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22241 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad