Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1521 (ALL)

ANAND PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/13674/2026 · 2026-05-06

Neeraj Tiwari, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 13674 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Shri Arpit Malviya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructous and may be dismissed as infructous. 2. Shri Anil Kumar Singh Baghel and learned Standing Counsel do not object to the same. 3. In light of such facts, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. May 7, 2026 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpit Malviya, Awadhesh Kumar Malviya Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anil Kumar Singh Baghel, C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Anand Prakash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad