Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15206 (PNJ)

MAHI PAL SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/5511/2026 · 2026-05-12

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5511 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 119 MAHI PAL SINGH STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA taken on record. 2. Warrant Officer visited the police station along with representative of the detenue, the detenue was present in the po report submitted by the Warrant Officer, the detenue was arrested in a case pertaining to FIR No. 351(2) and 238 of District Palwal. The report further reveals that all the requisite formalities and entries with regard to arrest of the detenue were duly recorded. 5511-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH MAHI PAL SINGH VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The report of Warrant Officer has been received. The same be taken on record. A perusal of abovementioned report shows that when the Warrant Officer visited the police station along with representative of the detenue, the detenue was present in the po report submitted by the Warrant Officer, the detenue was arrested in a case pertaining to FIR No.220 dated 28.11.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) and 238 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, District Palwal. The report further reveals that all the requisite formalities and entries with regard to arrest of the detenue were duly recorded. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5511-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Mr. Akhilesh Vyas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. The report of Warrant Officer has been received. The same be A perusal of abovementioned report shows that when the Warrant Officer visited the police station along with representative of the detenue, the detenue was present in the police station. However, as per report submitted by the Warrant Officer, the detenue was arrested in a case 220 dated 28.11.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Hassanpur, District Palwal. The report further reveals that all the requisite formalities and entries with regard to arrest of the detenue were duly recorded. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS The report of Warrant Officer has been received. The same be A perusal of abovementioned report shows that when the Warrant Officer visited the police station along with representative of the lice station. However, as per report submitted by the Warrant Officer, the detenue was arrested in a case 220 dated 28.11.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4), Police Station Hassanpur, District Palwal. The report further reveals that all the requisite formalities GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.12 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5511 3. illegal detention and his whereabouts hav petition has become infructuous 4. been rendered infructuous 5. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 5511-2026 (O&M) 8587 In view of abovementioned report, once the detenue was not in illegal detention and his whereabouts hav petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is hereby been rendered infructuous. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 In view of abovementioned report, once the detenue was not in illegal detention and his whereabouts have already been located, the present the present petition is hereby dismissed, as having :Yes/No : Yes/No In view of abovementioned report, once the detenue was not in the present as having GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.12 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document