( 2026:HHC:28275 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.709 of 2026 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 Prakash Chand and Ors. ….Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): On 24.06.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- “Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 23.06.2026 alongwith copy of office order dated 24.11.2025, wherein it has been stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent-Department by way of passing detailed speaking order, vide office order dated 24.11.2025.” 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available to them as per law, if they still remain aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 13, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement?