[2026:RJ-JP:1164] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 330/2026 1. Vinod S/o Maharam, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Jarel (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar). 2. Suresh S/o Sanwariya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jarel, Police Station Sadar Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 12/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 293/2025 registered at Police Station Jhalra Patan, District Alwar for the offences under Section 303 (2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case solely on the information of the other co-accused Sonu from whom, stolen motorcycle was recovered. Apart from the statement of co- accused Sonu, there is no another substantive piece of evidence available on record indicating the petitioners involvement in the alleged crime, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:1164] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-330/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Vinod S/o Maharam and 2. Suresh S/o Sanwariya, in connection with FIR No. 293/2025 registered at Police Station Jhalra Patan, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/146