Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15200 (RAJ)

OMPRAKASH CT NO. 772, SON OF SHRI MALA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/680/2026 · 2026-01-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2189] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 680/2026 Omprakash Ct No. 772, Son Of Shri Mala Ram, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Village-Shaidpur, Bhuwana, District- Jhunjhunu, Present Working In O/o 12Th Bn. Rac (Ir), Vikaspuri, New Delh-18. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Home Department, Secretariat, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Pin Code-302005 2. Addl. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter (Phq), Lalkothi, Jaipur-302015 3. Commandant, 12Th Bn. Rac (I.r), Vikaspuri, New Delhi- 18. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav Mr. Vishwas Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumitra Chaturvedi, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned order dated 14.11.2022 may kindly be quashed and set aside; 2. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, direct the official respondents that the petitioner be granted the benefit of financial upgradation under A.C.P. Scheme since the due date 1.e. 14.04.2014; 3. By appropriate writ, order or direction, direct the respondents to [2026:RJ-JP:2189] (2 of 3) [CW-680/2026] grant the arrear of the benefits accrued after granting the second financial upgradation w.e.f. 14.04.2014; 4. Or alternate, By appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 30.11.2009 i.e. 'Censure' may kindly be quashed and set aside and further directed to release the due benefits with consequentinal benefits; 5. Any other appropriate writ, order, or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deems think fit and proper be pass in favour of the petitioners; 6. Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 06.02.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1161/2025 titled as “Sohan Singh Constable No. 1333 (Ajmer) Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Raghuveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP no. 20358/2018). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Sohan Singh Constable No. 1333 (Ajmer) (supra) and Raghuveer Singh (supra). [2026:RJ-JP:2189] (3 of 3) [CW-680/2026] 4. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /136