Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15199 (GAU)

SHRI TOSHIZEMBA v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/224/2025 · 2026-09-28

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020007292025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/224/2025 SHRI TOSHIZEMBA JOINT DDIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS, KOHIMA NAGALAND VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA 2:THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY AND FINANCE COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE (DPC) TREASURIES AND ACCOUNBTS DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN NAGALAND KOHIM Advocate for the Petitioner : TONGPOK PONGENER, AKUM JAMIR,ASENLA S LKR,VIKEHIENUO VIMERHA,KETI IMCHEN,OZUNGLILA,HADASHA RUANGMEI Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 29-09-2026 Heard Mr. Tongpok Pongener, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. Mere, learned Sr. Government Advocate for the State respondents. After attempting to argue the matter at length, Mr. Tongpok Pongener, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to re-file the same by incorporating the required challenges for enabling the petitioner to claim the relief sought for by him in the present writ petition. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant