1 2026:CGHC:1918-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 107 of 2024 1 - Gayatri Sahu W/o Raghubar Sahu, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Ward No. 06 Old Sarkanda Daihanpara, Police Station - Sarkanda, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Raghubar Sahu S/o Late Tirath Ram Sahu, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Old Sarkanda Daihanpara, Police Station - Sarkanda, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Sarkanda, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Mamta Sahu W/o Kisan Sahu, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Infront of Swarna Residency Shivam City Road Mopka Tahsil - Masturi and District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Ms. Gunjan Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. B. Pandey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13-01-2026 1. Heard Ms. Gunjan Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the Respondent No.1/State and Mr. S.B. Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.01.14 11:45:03 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the F.I.R. No. 21/2023 dated 20.03.2023 registered against the petitioner for the offence u/s 498A and 34 of I.P.C. by the Police Station Mahila Thana, District Bilaspur (C.G.), in the interest of justice." 3. It transpires from the record that by the prayer made in the present petition the petitioners have challenged the FIR. On being pointed query made from the learned counsel for the petitioners that when the charge sheet has been filed way back in the year 2023 on 20-04-2023 and copy of the same has been annexed with the petition as Annexure-P/1, then why only the FIR has been challenged, she could not give any reply. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition afresh challenging the charge sheet. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty subject to depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- as cost by each of the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the said amount, i.e., Rs.10,000/- shall be transmitted to the Govt. Special School for Visual and Hearing Impaired, Tifra, District Bilaspur. 6. Copy of the charge sheet annexed with the petition be returned back to the learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining its copy in record. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil