Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1519 (JHR)

PARMESHWAR MANDAL v. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/4735/2021 · 2026-03-09

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6136 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4735 of 2021 ------ Parmeshwar Mandal, aged about 47 years, son of Mangi Mandal, Resident of Q. No.135-miner, Rajrappa Colony, PO-Rajrappa, PS- Rajrappa, Dist-Ramgarh, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Central Coalfields Limited through its Chairman-cum- Managing Director, having its office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, PO-GPO, PS-Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Director (Personnel), Central Coalfields Limited having its office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, PO-GPO, PS-Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The General manager (P & IR), Central Coalfields Limited having its office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, PO-GPO, PS- Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The General Manager, Rajrappa Area, Central Coalfields Limited having its office at Rajrappa, PO-Rajrappa Project, PS-Rajrappa, Dist-Ramgarh, Jhakrhand. 5. The Project Officer, Jarangdih Colliery, Kathara Area, Central Coalfields Limited, having its office at Jarangdih, PO- Jarangdih, PS-Bokaro Thermal, Dist-Bokaro, Jharkhand. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Raunak Sahay, Advocate Mr. Ujjal Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Adwitiya Atishrestha, Advocate ------ 08/ 09th March, 2026 I.A. No.1169 of 2026 1. By filing this interlocutory application, the petitioner wants to amend the writ petition. 2. The petitioner initially has challenged the charge-sheet. Now in a departmental proceeding, the petitioner has been dismissed from service. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order of dismissal is appealable. 3. Thus, there is no ground to allow the amendment application wherein the petitioner seeks to challenge the dismissal order. 2026:JHHC:6136 2 4. Thus, this interlocutory application stands dismissed. W.P.(S) No. 4735 of 2021 1. Learned counsel representing the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ application to prefer a departmental appeal. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a departmental appeal. Once the departmental appeal is filed, the Appellate Authority will consider all the plea of the petitioner, including the plea raised in this writ petition. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 09.03.2026 S.K.D/cp2 Uploaded on 12.03.2026