[2026:RJ-JP:3217] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 430/2026 Niyaj Kathat Urf Tonu S/o Shri Neera Kathat, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Hijadiyo Ka Badiya, Police Station Beawar Sadar, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/01/2026 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.296/2025 registered with the Police Station Beawar Sadar, District Beawar for offence under Sections 115(2), 127(4), 308(2) and 64(2)(m) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is a young boy, aged nineteen years and the prosecutrix is also major of age of about nineteen years. He further submits that the accused-petitioner and the prosecutrix were having love affairs and the prosecutrix went with the petitioner at her own sweet will. He also submits that the accused- petitioner remained with the prosecutrix for about three months at various places and she never raised any alarm or made any [2026:RJ-JP:3217] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-430/2026] complaint to anyone and she stayed in a hotel etc. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 06.10.2025 and Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge- sheet in the matter and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the fact of age of both the accused petitioner and the proseutrix and the fact that they both remained for about three months away from their house and stayed together in a hotel etc., but no alarm was raised by the prosecutrix, then possibility of false implication cannot be ruled out, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before [2026:RJ-JP:3217] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-430/2026] that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /126