Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15184 (AP)

NAGIREDDY VIKRAMARKA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/2006/2026 · 2026-01-30

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010025872026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2006/2026 Between: Nagireddy Vikramarka Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAJENDRA C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents particularly respondent Nos.4 to 6 who at the malafide instance and instigation of the respondent Nos.7 to 12 are insisting that the petitioners vacate and handover their ancestral agricultural lands admeasuring in total Ac.205.85 cents comprising Ac.65.00 cents in various subdivisions of Sy.Nos.62 55 2 123 127 128 131 132 137 and Ac 140 85 cents in various subdivisions of Sy Nos.60, 63, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 141, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 157, 158 and 159 all situated under one compact block at Thimmayapalem Revenue Villagem Chitvel Mandalm Tirupati District without issuing any notice and without following any procedure established by law as illegal irregular irrational without jurisdiction and violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14m 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment over their said landed properties and pass such orders….” 2. Sri Chandragiri Rajendra, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that respondent Nos.4 to 6, at the malafide instigation of respondent Nos.7 to 12, are insisting that the petitioners vacate and hand over their ancestral agricultural land admeasuring Ac.205.85 cents, comprising Ac.65 cents in various subdivisions. 3. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that on 10.01.2026, information was received through the Tahsildar, Chitvel Mandal, that the petitioner and the respondent had formed two groups and that one group was leveling the disputed land with a JCB, whereupon the other group, namely the petitioners, obstructed the same, resulting in a quarrel. Acting upon the said information, police staff from Chitvel Police Station were deputed to the spot, who prevented any breach of peace, advised both parties to resolve the dispute, if any, before the competent Civil Court, and warned both parties, thereby restoring and maintaining a peaceful atmosphere in the village. He further submits that the police have neither threatened nor insisted that the petitioners vacate the premises. 3 4. Recording the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 4th respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over their agricultural land. 5. In view of the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 31.01.2026 KMS 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.2006 of 2026 Date: 31.01.2026 KMS 73