HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35449 of 2026 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Heard Sri N.I.Jafri, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vijay Kumar, learned AGA-I, for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on bail in Session Case No.1155 of 2026 arising out of Case Crime No.13 of 2026, under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) BNS, Police Station North, District Firozabad during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that however, applicant is named in the FIR along with several others and as per allegation named accused persons badly beaten the deceaed due to which he died but post mortem report suggests that deceased sustained injuries on his non vital part and he died due to cardio pulmonary arrest and, therefore, present case does not travel beyond Section 105 BNS. 4. He further submits that after considering entire facts in detail co- accused Ankush and Nitin Singh, who were also named in the FIR, have been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 3.9.2026 and their bail order has been annexed at page 149 of the paper book and the case of applicant is at par with them. 5. He further submits that however, earlier applicant was made accused in a case of rape but in that case he has been acquitted. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh, Sadrul Islam Jafri, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pintoo Singh Urf Dharmendra Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. He further argued that applicant is not having any previous criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 6.1.2026 i.e., for the last nine months. 7. Per contra, learned AGA although opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant. 8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 9. However, applicant is named in the FIR along with others and according to the FIR, due to assault made by named accused deceased sutained injuries and died but considering the post mortem report of the deceased the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and other accused persons were not having any intention to cause his death, cannot be completely ruled out at this stage. 10. Further, co-accused Ankush and Nitin Singh have been released on bail by this Court and the case of applicant is at par with them. 11. Further, applicant is not having any previous criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 6.1.2026, i.e., for the last nine months. 12. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 13. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 14. Let the applicant-Pintoo Singh urf Dharmendra Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to BAIL No. 35449 of 2026 2 dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 15. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 16. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. October 6, 2026 SKM BAIL No. 35449 of 2026 3 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVANA KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad