Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1518 (JHR)

KARIM KAJI ALIAS ABDUL KARIM KAZI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./515/2026 · 2026-02-02

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:2558 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 515 of 2026 Karim Kaji @ Abdul Karim Kazi, aged about 47 years, son of Lejan Kaji @ Rejan Kaji, resident of village-Hussaindih, Jhalda, P.O. and P.S. Jhalda, District-Purulia, West Bengal, 723202, having UID No. 421311449735. ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Vikram Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. 02/ 02.02.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 96 of 2024, registered under sections 420, 406, 323, 500 of I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially complaint case was filed and pursuant to order of that learned court the complaint case has been converted into F.I.R. He further submits that marriage was fixed between the petitioner and daughter of the informant but due to certain dispute the said marriage was not solemnized. He further submits that certain amount has already been returned to the informant and for the rest amount the petitioner is also ready to return the said amount. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of taking money and not solemnizing the marriage. 5. Considering that for certain dispute marriage was not solemnized, the complainant case was filed for recovery of amount and it has ( 2026:JHHC:2558 ) been pointed out that certain amount has already been returned to the informant and for the rest amount the petitioner is also ready to return the said amount and in that view of the matter, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and the learned court shall release the petitioner on terms and conditions and sureties as learned court deems fit and proper. 6. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of. Dt.02.02.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-