1 APHC010171062026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 9334/2026 Between: 1. V SAI SREE RAM, S/O. VENIGALLA SIVA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. 4-358, RENDU RAMA MANDIRALA STREET, SHARAF BAZAR, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522503 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522238. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522238. 3. THE MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522503. 4. THE MUNICIPAL ENGINEER, MANGADAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522503. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Naseem Sultana, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. M. Sumalatha, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Ms. D. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Sri Goli GVS Sai, learned Counsel representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Mangalagiri Tadepalli Municipal Corporation. 2. Ms. Naseem Sultana, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner submits that she has instructions that the Writ Petitioner has admitted Rs.1,81,375/- as full and final amount that is due from Respondents. She would also submit that this amount of Rs.1,81,375/- has been received by the Writ Petitioner. She would therefore submit that no further consideration is necessary. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:04.05.2026 Vns