Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15179 (ALL)

SATYAM SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35571/2026 · 2026-10-05

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35571 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.78 out of 186) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Aniruddh Patel, Advocate holding brief of Sri Santosh Kr. Singh Paliwal, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one was rejected by this Court vide order 28.01.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.37889 of 2024. 4. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.213/2023, U/s 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 452, 302, 34 I.P.C. & 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station- Utraon, District- Prayagraj, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant could not produce any new ground for pressing the instant bail application, as such, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The instant bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 6. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 6, 2026 (Ravi Kant) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Awadh Narayan Tiwari, Santosh Kr. Singh Paliwal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satyam Srivastava .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad