Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15178 (JHR)

MD. WAKAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4571/2026 · 2026-05-29

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15695 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4571 of 2026 ---- 1. Md. Wakar, aged about 27 yrs. S/o Late Abdul Gaffar @ Abdul Gafar, 2. Md. Sahid @ Sahid aged about 29 yrs. S/o Md. Tayib @ Md. Taiyab, 3. Md. Warish @ Md. Waris aged about 23 yrs. S/o Md. Khalib @ Md. Khalid, 4. Imran Sekh @ Imran Shaikh, aged about 33 yrs. S/o Md. Abdul Gaffar, 5. Md. Ibrar @ Runu @ Md. Ibrar, aged about 43 yrs. S/o Shekh Siddik, 6. Md. Eyaj @ Md. Ayaz Alam, aged about 35 yrs. S/o Md. Alam 7. Sekh Asgar @ Md. Sher Asgar aged about 24 yrs. S/o Sekh Akbar @ Md. Akbar, 8. Md. Ehsan @Md. Ahsan @ Md. Ahan aged about 32 yrs. S/o Md. Nasim, 9. Md. Jamal @ Jamaluddin Khan aged about 33 yrs. S/o Late Mohasin @Md. Muslim Khan, 10. Md. Arsad, aged about 23 yrs. S/o Shek Akbar, 11. Md. Yatul @ Md. Ataul, aged about 25 yrs. S/o Md. Nasir, 12. Md. Nasir, aged about 55 yrs. S/o Md. Rajjak 13. Md. Maqud @ Md. Maksud, aged about 32 yrs. S/o Md. Nasir, All R/o Bhikrajpur, P.O. & P.S. Baliapur, Dist. Dhanbad. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P. ---- 02/Dated: 29th May, 2026 1. Heard Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP. 2. The petitioners are accused in connection with Baliapur P.S. Case No.58 of 2026. 3. It has been alleged that during the Ramnavami procession a riot like situation had led to vandalism and stone pelting from both the communities. Several police personnel had suffered injuries. 4. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It has further been stated that one of the co-accused namely Md. Mustak Alam has already been granted bail in B.A. No.4037 of 2026 vide order dated 12.05.2026. Learned counsel further adds that the petitioners are in custody since 28.03.2026. 5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:15695 Page | 2 B.A. No.4571 of 2026 6. Regard being had to the above, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Baliapur P.S. Case No.58 of 2026. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated: 29th May, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 01.06.2026