*1* 69revn119o10a121o10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 119 OF 2010 JANARDHAN KASHINATH KUMBHAR VERSUS SAU PUSHPA FULCHAND KALE AND ANR WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2010 JANARDHAN KASHINATH KUMBHAR VERSUS SHANKAR BHIVA MALI AND ANR … Shri Deshpande Gaurav L., Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A.A.A. Khan, APP for the Respondents/ State. Shri Akas D. Pawar, advocate h/f Shri Biradar R.D., Advocate for Respondent No.1. ... CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 05 October 2026 P. C. :- 1. This matter arises out of the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. Both the parties have filed the compromise deed and placed it on record. In pursuance of the said compromise terms, the learned advocates for the parties contend that the instant Revision Applications be disposed of in terms of the compromise 2026:BHC-AUG:46592 *2* 69revn119o10a121o10 deed. 3. In the compromise terms, the complainant has given no objection for disposal of the revisions after receipt of the amount pursuant to the impugned judgment and order. It stated that in pursuance of the terms of settlement, the applicant has paid Rs.1,10,000/- and the complainant has received the said amount. The remaining amount of Rs.60,000/- is deposited before the Trial Court and the same is permitted to be withdrawn by the complainant. 4. Since the parties have arrived at settlement and it is prayed that these revision applications be allowed in view of the compromise terms, both the Revision Applications are allowed accordingly. The impugned judgments and orders are quashed and set aside in terms of the settlement dated 17.07.2026, which are taken on record and marked as ‘X’. kps ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. )