[2026:RJ-JP:2711] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 307/2026 Balram @ Ballu S/o Radhakishan, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Rodavad, Police Station Bahrawanda Kalan, District Sawai Madhopur. (Currently In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam Sharma for Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.276/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawaimadhopur, District-Sawai Madhopur for offences under Sections 281 and 125(a) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the name of the present petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR. He also submits that as per FIR the matter pertains to rash and negligent driving, which allegedly resulted in injuries to the grandmother of the complainant. He averred that although, during the course of investigation, it was revealed that the motorcycle [2026:RJ-JP:2711] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-307/2026] involved in the commission of the offence was sold by the petitioner on the basis of forged documents, but there is no documentary evidence on record to substantiate this allegation. Though six cases have have been reported against the present petitioner but out of all in four cases are of RPGO and in other two cases, he is bailed out. Petitioner is behind the bars since 23.12.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Balram @ Ballu S/o Radhakishan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/120