[2026:RJ-JP:836] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 301/2026 1. Shri Bajrang Bali Enterprises, Through Proprietor Rud Mal Bajya S/o Shri Natthu Ram Bajya,aged About 43 Years, R/o Dhani Chani Ki, Home No-252, Veer Tejaji Nagar, Badnagar, Paota, Jaipur, (Rajasthan.) Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ32GD8768. 2. Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Ramkaran, R/o Pahadi, Tehsil Behror, Alwar, (Rajasthan.) Owner Of Vehicle Registration No.RJ32GD8690. 3. Tilok Puri S/o Shri Manak Puri, R/o 137 Swamiyon Ka Bas, Seora, Nagrasar, Bikaner, (Rajasthan) Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ07GE2683. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Kotputli, District Kot- putli-Behror, Rajasthan. 5. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Sikar, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 6. District Transport Officer, DTO Office Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan 7. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Jaipur First, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Bikaner, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 9. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Alwar, District Al- war, Rajasthan. 10. Regional Transport Officer, RTO Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:836] (2 of 3) [CW-301/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore on behalf of Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 09/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehi- cles owned/ possessed by the petitioners were suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioners were not af- forded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. 3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effec- tive subject to the condition that the petitioners will produce their vehicle before the Transport Department, who will examine and in- spect the vehicles’ make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accor- dance with law. 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicles to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/in- 1S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:836] (3 of 3) [CW-301/2026] spection and shall not authorize the vehicle to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioners, along with their vehicles concerned, shall re- port to/ before the respective DTO who passed the order of sus- pension of registration of the subject vehicles, on 27.01.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioners. 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 11.02.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/75