Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15164 (JHR)

ALTMASH SHEKH @ ALATMASH SHEKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4641/2026 · 2026-05-29

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:15734 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4641 of 2026 --- Altmash Shekh @ Alatmash Shekh … … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party(s) --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : A.P.P. --- 2/29.05.2026 Heard Mr. Rahul Ranjan learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 43 of 2026. It has been alleged that the petitioner and others were apprehended by the police and from their possession mobiles and SIMs were recovered. They were suspected to be involved in cyber crime. So far as the petitioner is concerned, one mobile and two SIM cards were recovered from his possession. Submissions has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no victim has come forward to lodge any complaint. Learned counsel adds that petitioner is in custody since 26.03.2026 and he does not have any criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Regard being had to the above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum-Cyber Crime, Special Court at Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 43 of 2026 subject to the condition that one of the bailor should be a close relative of the petitioner. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) 29th May, 2026. Simran/-