- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3427 OF 2025 IN REVNST/9384/2025 VIJAY NAMDEV GADEKAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Mr.A.D.Hande, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr.C.V.Bhadane, APP for the Respondent/State. Ms.Deepali S.Patil (Yenegure), Advocate for Respondent No.2 (Appointed) ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 6th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : 0001-01-01 1. After hearing the learned Advocates for the respective parties and the learned APP, when this Court shown it’s disinclination to entertain the Revision Application, the learned Advocate for the Applicants seeks permission to withdraw the Revision Application. 2. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of, as withdrawn. In view of disposal of the Criminal Revision Application, Cri.Appl.No.3427/2025, filed for condonation of delay does not survive, hence also stands disposed of. khs/Oct.2026/3427 0001-01-01 2026:BHC-AUG:46811 - 2 - 3. It is made clear that this Court has not considered the instant Applications on merit. Hence, the learned Trial Court shall not influence by the order of this Court. 4. The High Court Legal Aid Sub Committee, Aurangabad to pay the fees of the learned Advocate Mr.Deepali Patil (Yenegure), who was appointed to represent Respondent No.2, as per Rules. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/Oct.2026/3427 0001-01-01