Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15156 (CAL)

RABEYA YUSUF KHATUN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WP.ST/33/2024 · 2026-03-19

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 11 19.03.2026 Court No.04 B.K.N W.P.S.T. 33 of 2024 Rabeya Yusuf Khatun Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Ld. AGP, Ms. Ashmita Chakraborty … for the State. Mr. Tapasi Sinha Palit … for the Respondent No. 8. 1. There is none to represent the writ petitioner. 2. State is represented. 3. Respondent no. 8 is also represented. 4. It appears that on earlier two consecutive occasions nobody was present to represent the writ petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed further with the present case. 5. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed for default. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)