Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15154 (RAJ)

HAIDAR ALI S/O SHRI NAHHA KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/428/2026 · 2026-01-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1304] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 428/2026 Haidar Ali S/o Shri Nanha Khan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Nayapura Ablaghat, Mandsour, Police Station Shahar Kotwali, Mandsour, District Mandsour, Madhya Pradesh. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Beawar ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naseemudin Quazi for Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.298/2025 registered at Police Station Masuda, District Beawar for offences under Sections 3, 5, 8 and 9 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation levelled against the present petitioner is that he was transporting bovine animals in the alleged vehicle for the purpose of slaughter. He further submits that offence is triable by Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.04.2025 without [2026:RJ-JP:1304] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-428/2026] any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Haidar Ali S/o Shri Nanha Khan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/173